HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 165A
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '17 at 22:12
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 92.8
49% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 131
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770M
HP(103C 165A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.810.4.1000
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.27
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 6.38
7% 7.57 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 9.04
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
677GB free
Firmware: GL00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 57
Write 80
Mixed 58.8
49% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.13
49% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback