HP 15-cb004nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15-cb004nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory7.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 180
55% 101 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 315
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDASN8Y256G 256GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40103000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 128 84 110 115 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69% Good
Read 341
Write 259
Mixed 237
SusWrite 122
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 31.2
113% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 209
180% 268 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
482GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 68 85 91 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 63
Write 78.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 75.4
43% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CRC Kingston 9905624-054.A00G 10GB
2400, 2400 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback