Wacom MobileStudio Pro 16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Wacom MobileStudio Pro 16 (all builds)
Motherboard	Insyde MCALLAN
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200706
Uptime	21.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6267U 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 129 50% 85.6 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 195 27% 198 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 01CF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 13 Parallax 13.4 10% 12.7 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 12.4 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4 256GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 13 15 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
LaCie Rugged USB-C 2TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 556GB free, PID 108c Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 45 36 30 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 82.5 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 40.4 90% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NTD 2x4GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 15.9 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 58: 8R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
58%	20%	70	42	19	60	27"	2560 1440	SAM0DD3 C27H71x

History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 50: 5R 5G 10B | Score 42: 4R 5G 7B | Score 58: 8R 6G 0B | Score 58: 8R 6G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MobileStudio Pro 16 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Wacom MobileStudio Pro 16

CPU
Core i7-6567UIntelBench 57%, 456 samples	35x
Core i7-8559UIntelBench 78%, 2,379 samples	29x
Core i5-6267UIntelBench 57%, 1,134 samples	4x

GPU
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	29x
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	22x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	9x

SSD
SM280512GPMC15B-S10C4 512GBPhisonBench 77%, 126 samples	24x
ESMP512GTB3C2-E8 512GBPhisonBench 116%, 41 samples	10x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples	10x

RAM
H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NTD 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 165 samples	31x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	25x
H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NUD 2x8GBHynixBench 60%, 11,327 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16