HP ZBook 15 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2253
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 521
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
HP(103C 2253) 2GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 8.8
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.2
6% 8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 199 206 198 198 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 405
Write 273
Mixed 158
SusWrite 203
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 32.2
113% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 140
143% 235 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 32% 28 29 5 60 24.1" 1920 1200 HWP326E HP E242
Typical ZBook 15 G2 Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback