NEC PC-VK25LAZNG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNEC PC-VK25LAZNG  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC AR1CR2
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 04:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
Micro-FCPGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 116
56% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 174
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 6005) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200424
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 48 31 35 36 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 251
Write 114
Mixed 162
SusWrite 39.7
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 8.8
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 14.2
29% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD033B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback