AMD Pumori CRB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAMD Pumori CRB  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 22:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD R-464L APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 31.3
2-Core 66.2
39% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 121
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel S3500 Series 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 68 70 68 92 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 304
Write 135
Mixed 131
SusWrite 80.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 24.7
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 29.3
32% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
130GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 18 18 22 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 19.8
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UG25U6411N8SU-BDO UG25U6411N8SU-BDO 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 3 64 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback