Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 95.1 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 182 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 547 56% 454 Pts	64-Core 656 41% 656 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 82E5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 4.2 9% 9.5 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 4.7 6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-arc1 00 480GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 219 189 218 220 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 352 Write 222 Mixed 200 SusWrite 211 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 21.9 81% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 62.6 DQ Mixed 81 74% 116 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 152GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 124 124 125 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 96.2 Write 91.8 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 124 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $394

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16