Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '21 at 21:28
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 22 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 61.1 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 168 54% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 578 56% 460 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1620 Write 1,679 Mixed 1,786 380% 1,695 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 41.1 134% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 919 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 542 474% 711 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 77%
WD My Passport 2626 2TB 8,368 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 2626 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 109 111 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 67.1 Write 103 Mixed 72 SusWrite 112 126% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.8 240% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 43.5 124% 43.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16