Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '17 at 05:49
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 233 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 602 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 117 Parallax 106 89% 111 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 102 Splatting 94.9 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 310GB free Firmware: GM4O Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 269 Write 177 Mixed 211 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 6.68 89% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 4.59 50% 117 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 117%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB 18,578 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 482 Write 454 Mixed 618 116% 518 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 6.57 87% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 10.2 22% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 332%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 64GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 37GB free, PID 0306 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 33.1 Write 19.9 Mixed 20.2 29% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.74 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.49 157% 3.54 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	64.7% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 20.7 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 21.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	226x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	65x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	41x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	15x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $737

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16