Asus PRIME X299 EDITION 30

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299 EDITION 30  (all builds)
Memory237.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 01:29
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 282
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,073
95% 808 Pts
64-Core 3,278
203% 3,278 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 282
Parallax 318
259% 306 fps
MRender 339
Gravity 244
Splatting 183
201% 256 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 4TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 435 437 435 437 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 439
Mixed 355
SusWrite 436
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 36.1
139% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 264
222% 323 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 104%
Great: 138%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 472 466 463 464 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 464
Mixed 447
SusWrite 467
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 48.3
167% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
6TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 472 466 463 464 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 465
Mixed 414
SusWrite 467
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 47.1
163% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-32GTZR 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 65.3
MC Mixed 48.7
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 128%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 240 27" 1280 720 AUS2712 ROG XG27AQM
Typical PRIME X299 EDITION 30 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299 EDITION 30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback