Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '21 at 01:16
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 160 2-Core 319 103% 190 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 949 98% 788 Pts	64-Core 1,194 74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 98.5 Reflection 136 Parallax 84.3 80% 106 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 103 Splatting 100 82% 99.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 612GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42BEU1TB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 820 1060 1440 1471 1466 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	321% Outstanding	Read 2,388 Write 1,431 Mixed 1,556 SusWrite 1,268 370% 1,661 MB/s	4K Read 70.6 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 94.5 314% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,357 DQ Write 931 DQ Mixed 703 644% 997 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 321% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 34.6 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 32.4 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 36.6 89% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	DELA0D1 Dell S2716DG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,047x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	451x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	397x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	332x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	313x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	257x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	86x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16