Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '17 at 00:31
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 880 808 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 97 1-Core 96 2-Core 193 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 485 53% 418 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 41.1 Parallax 54.6 37% 47.1 fps	MRender 56.9 Gravity 52.1 Splatting 39 39% 49.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 105 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 62 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 65 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1352771301	65.5% Good	Read 269 Write 214 Mixed 219 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 38.3 104% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 88.5 92% 151 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 50.2 80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	137x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	72x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	16x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	15x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	69x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16