MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3620 x 1527 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '17 at 00:23
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 589
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 152
Parallax 130
114% 141 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR150 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
Read 501
Write 254
Mixed 315
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 15.9
80% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 47.5
36% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 67%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
135GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 520
Write 351
Mixed 354
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 9.85
96% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 39.9
57% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75%
Great: 101%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 110
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.19
84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 1,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback