PC NH5x_7xDPx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC NH5x_7xDPx  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo NHxxDPx
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 141
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 260
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7168
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.4% Poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 21.3
17% 26.1 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 50.8
33% 38.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB PCS PCIe M 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,570
Write 1,122
Mixed 709
250% 1,133 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 10.6
98% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 41.4
86% 186 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 164%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.2
Write 111
Mixed 56.3
57% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
78GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.1
Write 4.2
Mixed 13.7
26% 31 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
59% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_7xDPx Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: PC NH5x_7xDPx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback