Emachines G730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEmachines G730  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eMachines G730
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 16:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 100
45% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 132
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 0382) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1201.1006
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 59 68 69 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 76.5
Write 71.3
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 66.8
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ10UE8BDS0-AE-F 80CE M471B5673EH1-CF8 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G730 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines G730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback