Biostar A320MH PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 15:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 191
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 417
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 33.1
18% 27.5 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 20
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 256GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 48 49 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 12% Great: 15%
Virtual Disk 1TB
33GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 49 49 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 100% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical A320MH PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback