PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101118 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '21 at 02:21 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 112 114 126 133 MB/s
|
70.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:01 98 KHX1600C9D3/4GX ID:01 98 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24% | 14% | 57 | 106 | 5 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D20 S24F350 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |