TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire 4745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 4745  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZQ1
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 22:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 122
50% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 147
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 44.3%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0356) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.38%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 162 192 190 194 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 212
Write 205
Mixed 195
SusWrite 186
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 8.3
47% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 53.7
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 15.1
36% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 38%
 Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
266GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 59.7
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 61.2
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 35.2%
 Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CH9 SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 23.3%
 Great: 24%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire 4745 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4745

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel  $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples4x
Core i3 M 370Intel  $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples4x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples3x
GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples15x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples1x
SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD  $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples1x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples1x
S700 120GBHP  $30Bench 62%, 4,522 samples1x
RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples4x
SH564568FH8NWPHSFR 2x2GBSmartBench 28%, 160 samples2x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback