Itmediaconsult Pentino H-Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemItmediaconsult Pentino H-Series  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81M-E34 (MS-7817)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 09:45
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 588
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 96
Parallax 100
81% 98.5 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 76.9
77% 97.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 83 83 73 80 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 155
Write 106
Mixed 132
SusWrite 77.5
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 27.1
118% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 98.6
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
ST3500320AS 480GB
233GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 266 124 7.4 7.6 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 15.7
Write 267
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 85.6
23% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 27
49% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 35.8
70% 138 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
204GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 91 92 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 66.1
Write 68.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 86.5
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C9 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 17% 71 111 7 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELF046 DELL U2413
Typical Pentino H-Series Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Itmediaconsult Pentino H-Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback