Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,247
109% 930 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 180
Parallax 182
145% 180 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 158
Splatting 147
133% 165 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 133%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 317 317 313 308 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 467
Mixed 434
SusWrite 314
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 52.3
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 270
227% 329 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
280GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 489 491 491 492 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 504
Write 463
Mixed 392
SusWrite 490
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 56.9
189% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
134GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 489 491 491 491 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 502
Write 464
Mixed 394
SusWrite 489
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 52
181% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 163
132% 191 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
201GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1523 1271 1274 1276 1275 1273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,477
Write 2,007
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 1,315
396% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 88.1
294% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,128
845% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 321%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
324GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1789 1254 1254 1252 1252 1250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 1,342
407% 1,821 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 87.3
294% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,231
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,130
845% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 321%
Great: 372%
AFT SD PRO88 Reader 128GB
103GB free, PID 5111
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 94.2
Write 84.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 87.5
116% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.5
223% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 101%
Drobo 5D 70.5TB
48.5TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 288 285 283 292 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 234
Mixed 200
SusWrite 284
321% 228 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.6
255% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 32.6
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $804
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback