Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 158
53% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 145
26% 181 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 8.2
7% 6.67 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0128G PCIe 121GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW3SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 739
Write 441
Mixed 390
115% 523 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 19
58% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 236
197% 290 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 220%
APPLE SD Card Reader 250GB
206GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 42 48 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 71.6
Write 51.1
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 44.6
76% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4
296% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 3% 66 66 51 60 13.3" 1440 900 APP9CDF Color LCD
Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback