Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 386 47% 361 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 38.2 30% 38.6 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 27.5 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 108 177 177 168 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 417 Write 114 Mixed 205 SusWrite 152 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 28.1 101% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 181 141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 88%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 426GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 376 380 380 382 393 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 346 Mixed 416 SusWrite 388 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 40.1 131% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 367 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 156GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 120 119 119 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 113 Write 26.7 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 119 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 309GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 71 72 71 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 8.7 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 70.7 46% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 41%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 332GB free, PID 61f5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 271 275 278 279 281 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 275 Write 126 Mixed 232 SusWrite 276 300% 227 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 21.6 1,592% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 32.8 DQ Mixed 27.6 2,146% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 379%
FUJITSU HandyDrive500 320GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 164GB free, PID 11bc Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 12.4 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 28.4 31% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 4,192 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.9"	1280 720	ENC2786 EV2451

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,531x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	951x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	560x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	311x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	269x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16