Acer Predator G9-791

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-791 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Challenger_SLS
Memory	10.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171016
Uptime	46.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 171 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 510 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Acer(1025 105B) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 40.8 32% 42.5 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 44.9 Splatting 39.5 31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB 5,880 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUCA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 138 87 85 90 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 420 Write 128 Mixed 167 SusWrite 109 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 79.8 4K Mixed 34.3 102% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 201 166% 241 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 293GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 92 90 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 80.5 Write 80.2 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 89.9 49% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 75%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 29GB free, PID null, SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32 GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 59 32 25 25 25 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 102 Write 39.8 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 34.7 73% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.1 226% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 24GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.4% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17.3"	1280 720	LGD0469

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-791 Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-791

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	197x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	25x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	100x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	64x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	56x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	20x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	19x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	19x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	85x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	19x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $69

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48