Asrock 4CoreDual-SATA2.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 4CoreDual-SATA2.  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 79.1
41% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 78.9
8-Core 78.4
11% 78.7 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SV4012H 40GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RM100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 22 27 25 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 27.4
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 25.6
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 17%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
51GB free
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 34 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 29.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 32.7
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4CoreDual-SATA2. Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 4CoreDual-SATA2.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback