Asus X555DG

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X555DG (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X555DG
Memory	5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151204
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '21 at 05:13
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 2,236 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 47.5 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 19.2 28% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 131 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 87.3 5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 1B8D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2.8 0% 2.67 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 111 62 18 38 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 206 Write 97.3 Mixed 122 SusWrite 47.5 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 11.4 46% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 51.7 DQ Write 92.2 DQ Mixed 80.8 59% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 168GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 74 69 66 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 90.6 Write 94.3 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 71.2 57% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 6 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	4	60	15.5"	1280 701	AUO38ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X555DG Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X555DG

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 7,922 samples	28x
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 2,236 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	21x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	19x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples	7x

SSD
256G 256GBWalramBench 132%, 292 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 886 samples	23x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 242 samples	6x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 12GBSamsungBench 19%, 146 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16