Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 01:22
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 140
54% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 222
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
ASRock(1849 990C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 7.5
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 32 32 30 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
57GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 75 72 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 80.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 75.8
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
160GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 30.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 19.5
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 19%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
31GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 37.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 20.7
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.1% Below average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 16% 19 15 5 60 23.8" 1920 1080 PHLC155 PHL 243V7
Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback