Maxsun MS-A68GT+ FS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMaxsun MS-A68GT+ FS  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 19:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 750 (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 116
47% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 33
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23.7
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 12 0GB SSD
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 100 92 122 105 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 356
Write 124
Mixed 139
SusWrite 103
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 6.2
33% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PUD31600C114GVS Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 19" 1280 720 SAM0573 SyncMaster
Typical MS-A68GT+ FS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-A68GT+ FS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback