Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200806
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 06:20
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 289
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 934
87% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 88.3
43% 69.9 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 42.4
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 268 314 219 425 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 436
Mixed 339
SusWrite 319
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 39.8
144% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 62.6
124% 248 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 125%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
501GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1801 1222 1304 1159 1297 1131 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 2,254
Mixed 1,822
SusWrite 1,319
417% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 75.6
262% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 1,003
751% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 288%
Great: 347%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
884GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 33.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 15.5
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
281GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 27.4
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 12.7
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 43%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
96GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 34.9
Write 25.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 13.6
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.3
418% 5.7 MB/s
DQ Read 7.1
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
448% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 30.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 31.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 27" 1280 720 DEL41B3 DELL U2720Q
Typical AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $559
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback