Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E900  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 20:24
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 48
2-Core 120
48% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 202
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490
HP(103C 90B8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 402 413 413 177 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 429
Mixed 397
SusWrite 318
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 36.9
134% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 235
185% 254 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 99%
Jmicron Generic 120GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 32
Write 27.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 29.6
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 7
1,188% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 31%
Apple iPod 4GB
4GB free, PID 120a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.9 5.8 6.1 5.7 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 4.2
Mixed 3.8
SusWrite 5.7
6% 4.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 3%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
29GB free, PID 0250
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 24 18 12 18 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 23.7
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 16.3
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
131% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 24" 1280 720 ACR0758 EK240Y
Typical ESPRIMO E900 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback