Asus PRIME H310M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 15:33
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 898
88% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 147
Parallax 135
115% 141 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 144
Splatting 121
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 19 52 51 20 9.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 221
Write 102
Mixed 126
SusWrite 54.1
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 27.7
101% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 165
152% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55%
Great: 100%
I-O DATA SSPH-UT 480GB
34GB free, PID 0176
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.6 256 263 282 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 340
Write 269
Mixed 220
SusWrite 142
310% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 12.3
1,350% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 13.1
1,386% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 163%
Great: 194%
Initio INIC-3609 3TB
420GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 127 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 76.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 127
112% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2666 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 9% 64 323 233 30 72.3" 1536 864 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 18: 0R 6G 0B
Typical PRIME H310M-A Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback