ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '21 at 21:37
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 489 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 620 38% 620 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 8.5 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 62 9.4 41 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 412 Write 276 Mixed 234 SusWrite 48.6 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 14.5 60% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 42.6 36% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 53%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 439GB free Firmware: 0A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 94 95 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 92.9 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 93.8 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 2x8GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.2% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 20.6 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback