MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7808
MotherboardMSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130930
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 03 '17 at 13:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 174
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 302
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 65.9
62% 71.8 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 78.4
65% 79.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 256GB-$203
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 462
Write 305
Mixed 354
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 12.4
76% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 12.4
19% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
453GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 160
Mixed 147
119% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.31
106% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 075D GR1333D364L9/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback