Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$145 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 71.4 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 281 77% 149 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 814 83% 673 Pts	64-Core 820 51% 820 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Asus(1043 8539) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.6% Very good	Lighting 91.6 Reflection 110 Parallax 97.9 75% 99.8 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 81.3 72% 88.3 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dogfish 500GB 500GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0712B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 260 11 67 43 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 424 Write 353 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 134 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 0.7 39% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 58.8 DQ Mixed 53.4 57% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 820GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 113 114 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 126 Write 103 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 113 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$33 14,163 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.2 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 21.5 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 3R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	52%	29	259	169	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0C57 T27D590

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	300x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	156x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x

SSD
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GBSeagateBench 150%, 932 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 630 samples	85x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16