GMK NucBox2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGMK NucBox2  (all builds)
MotherboardGMK GMK
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 11:13
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 254
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 619
70% 547 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 14.5
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 0.1
7% 9.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac S930E8/256GYN 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1202A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1870
Write 1,029
Mixed 1,018
287% 1,306 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 29
187% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 469
440% 677 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 221%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
870GB free
Firmware: JT000A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 98.8
Mixed 53.9
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 14.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 14% 35 69 6 60 57.8" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical NucBox2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: GMK NucBox2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback