Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 16:59
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 86
2-Core 203
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 528
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 1.7
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.5
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1541 1524 1431 662 1239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,683
Write 1672
Mixed 1,337
SusWrite 1,304
337% 1,499 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 60.3
201% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 284
207% 271 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 221%
Great: 311%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 87 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 196
Write 182
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 87.9
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
77GB free
Firmware: 80.00B80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 203
Write 176
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 93
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1
268% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback