Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 10.3 2-Core 20.9 16% 21.6 Pts	4-Core 19.2 8-Core 20.5 3% 19.9 Pts	64-Core 21.9 1% 21.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 8 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 052D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.9 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 72 67 65 77 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 31.2 Write 89.2 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 68.1 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5173CB0-YK0 5GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.77% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	6x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 53 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GBKingstonBench 18%, 620 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	1x
ACR128X64D3S1333C9 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 3GBKingstonBench 19%, 77 samples	1x