Gigabyte GA-W480 VISION D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-W480 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 20:50
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1290P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 317
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,188
108% 906 Pts
64-Core 2,118
131% 2,118 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30001 500GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STOSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2167 2189 1059 492 496 489 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1821
Write 2083
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 1,149
380% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 64.1
206% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 677
506% 680 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 238%
Great: 355%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30001 500GB
316GB free
Firmware: STOSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2164 2306 2220 2299 2323 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,847
Write 2,088
Mixed 1,692
SusWrite 1961
429% 1,897 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 66
217% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 694
513% 685 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 292%
Great: 355%
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA500GM10001 500GB
2TB free
Firmware: SU0SC011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 671 674 674 675 673 670 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-027.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 28.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 30.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 33 309 235 32 0" 1280 1024
Typical GA-W480 VISION D Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-W480 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback