Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27N (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121025
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '21 at 17:09
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	CIV-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 121 50% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 169 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 0% 1.53 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 6.6 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 59 52 48 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 90.6 Write 86.9 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 59 49% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 28.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 6.7 13% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.9 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.7 10% 9.33 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD033A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C855-27N Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27N

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27N

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-27N

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)