Biostar A58ML

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A58ML  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 127
53% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 209
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Nvidia(10DE 0FC8) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.8
7% 9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 111 126 106 130 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 158
Write 140
Mixed 137
SusWrite 119
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 27.1
89% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 74.4
DQ Mixed 31.1
29% 44 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
660GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 102 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 77.4
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 98.3
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 25 5 60 72.3" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical A58ML Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58ML

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback