Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 247 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 604 62% 501 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 7.1 5% 25.6 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 10.6 8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 824 847 874 786 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,063 Write 810 Mixed 779 SusWrite 694 188% 837 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 67.4 233% 82.9 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 333 299% 440 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 209%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 645GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 454 466 462 422 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 440 Mixed 388 SusWrite 437 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 40 133% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 321 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.1 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 23.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0042

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	389x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	184x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	108x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	463x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	276x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	302x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	159x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	207x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	116x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 928 samples	67x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16