Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD4  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 11:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 150
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 369
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 106 103 113 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 174
Write 112
Mixed 128
SusWrite 109
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 16
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 90.1
75% 108 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 1 60 20" 1280 720 ACR01A8 Acer P206HL
Typical GA-P55A-UD4 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback