HP 810-109

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 810-109  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 518
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 40.9
34% 43 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.8
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 122 88 77 67 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 412
Write 185
Mixed 215
SusWrite 97
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 15.3
97% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 30.3
45% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 173 173 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 134
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 172
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 8GB-$13
7GB free, PID a833
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 13.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 12.9
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.2
88% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 33% 15 106 6 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACI22FD ASUS VS228
Typical 810-109 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP 810-109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback