Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	551% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH570
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11900H 6,494 User benchmarks, average bench 89% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 72.9 1-Core 185 2-Core 370 108% 209 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 887 96% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,026 64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop) 16,265 User benchmarks, average bench 125% Device(1A58 201A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6650 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 165 Parallax 145 117% 151 fps	MRender 152 Gravity 118 Splatting 111 102% 127 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 144%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 859GB free (System drive) Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3837 3748 3700 3742 3672 3671 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	551% Outstanding	Read 3,080 Write 343 Mixed 3,020 SusWrite 3,728 571% 2,543 MB/s	4K Read 82.5 4K Write 290 4K Mixed 124 437% 165 MB/s	DQ Read 1,612 DQ Write 1,332 DQ Mixed 1,488 1,110% 1,478 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 551% Great: 427%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB 15,521 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 32.4 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 20.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	18	110	6	60	15.5"	1920 1080	SDC4143

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	1,165x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples	262x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	535x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	431x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	319x

SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	887x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	289x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	48x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	403x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	338x
Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBGoldBench 88%, 237 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16