Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C70D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Larne
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 14:44
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 44.1
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 31
22% 30.2 Pts
4-Core 31
8-Core 30.8
4% 30.9 Pts
64-Core 30.2
2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 240 217 308 334 287 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0396
Typical SATELLITE C70D-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback