MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 05:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 6.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 279
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 879
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 55.8
50% 60.4 fps
MRender 48.1
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 51.7
43% 52 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KNUP-SSD-120G 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 42 37 34 48 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 474
Write 368
Mixed 318
SusWrite 89.2
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 1.2
48% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 20.4
DQ Mixed 26.5
30% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
966GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 93 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 63.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 91.6
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 62%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
222GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
61% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 91.8
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DDR4 8GB 2666MHz 029E CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 16.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback