MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive447% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 04:51
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,182
106% 894 Pts
64-Core 2,886
179% 2,886 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 182
Parallax 400
155% 257 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 131
Splatting 186
164% 205 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3342 3358 3352 2383 1677 1708 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
447% Outstanding
Read 2,913
Write 3,380
Mixed 3,090
SusWrite 2,637
679% 3,005 MB/s
4K Read 80.7
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 110
361% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,386
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1268
954% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 447%
Great: 488%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
655GB free
Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1449 1446 1431 1446 1442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,467
Write 1,448
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1,442
362% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 74.2
254% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 1,239
DQ Mixed 1160
913% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 324%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 4133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 38.3
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $905
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback