Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513UA
Memory16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 22:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 151
51% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 459
60% 450 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 17C2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.48
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 3.7
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TB
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 665 696 787 811 810 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1065
Write 958
Mixed 915
SusWrite 762
208% 925 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 40.6
178% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 677
493% 645 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 170%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback