Biostar H81MHV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 12:09
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 372
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M3 120G SSD 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 142 59 74 47 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 433
Write 374
Mixed 316
SusWrite 73.9
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 20.4
122% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 27
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
111GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 129 138 135 134 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 149
Write 120
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 137
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 5R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 16% 56 301 222 60 0" 1440 900
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 29: 5R 0G 4B
Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback