Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 286 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 1,079 93% 795 Pts	64-Core 2,119 131% 2,119 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3233) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 118 Parallax 105 86% 109 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 103 Splatting 93.5 80% 99 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE SSD 960GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 353 261 132 101 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 383 Write 389 Mixed 337 SusWrite 226 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 28.1 97% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 162 132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 107%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 201 202 203 204 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 202 Mixed 102 SusWrite 203 130% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 32,191 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 54.9 MC Write 44.6 MC Mixed 45 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 30.3 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 39.9 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	60	27"	1280 720	GSM59BD 27EA33

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,337x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,056x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	882x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	400x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	384x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	206x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	158x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	125x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16