Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 04:27
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 75
2-Core 143
56% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 227
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 289 298 295 293 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 305
Write 379
Mixed 220
SusWrite 303
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 15.9
71% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 278
214% 293 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
368GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 196 190 188 185 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 67.4
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 190
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 8005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 6.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 6.4
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
81% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 68: 8R 8G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
68% 20% 101 150 82 60 27" 1920 1080 BNQ78E6 BenQ GW2780
History: Score 44: 4R 6G 6B | Score 68: 8R 8G 4B
Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback